We assure you, this is only for 'improved personalized ad delivery.'
The New Employee Monitoring Policy Reads Your Thoughts, But Only The "Brain-Wide Signal"
Meta has apparently been working on a new internal tool that can observe an employee's "brain-wide signal," which is only slightly more invasive than the mandatory bi-weekly desk audits. The philosophical implication isn't whether the AI model can read the signal, but why the brain itself hasn't figured out a way to use this signal for improved internal resource allocation, or at least remember to reply to that Slack message from three days ago.
Management assures us that this development is not about reading your thoughts on the new cafeteria food. It's purely an exercise in "data alignment." If the AI can observe the signal, it's just following the company mandate to leverage all available telemetry for 'optimizing the human-computer interface'—a process that currently requires three VPs, an offshore team, and a series of mandatory, poorly-lit video calls. It’s simply another mandatory software update for the human condition. =======
Internal Memo Confirms Brains May Be Susceptible to Our Own Software
Re: Mandatory Opt-In for Internal Mental Read-Only API (v1.0)
Meta is currently piloting a new feature where their AI models might be able to read a brain-wide signal, a capability which has been framed less as a technological breakthrough and more as a new compliance issue. The memo from the Research division notes the core problem is that if the model is going to all the trouble of reading the signal, the brain should probably just cooperate.
The internal email stresses this is not a privacy concern, but a feature parity issue, and users who feel their private thoughts are being 'read' should submit a JIRA ticket under the "Unauthorized Cognitive Access" category. This category is currently P4 and will be reviewed quarterly by a team whose primary function is currently being outsourced to an early-stage LLM. We are reminded that this whole effort is likely an attempt to justify the server costs incurred during the Q3 GPU purchase spree. >>>>>>> Stashed changes
New Style Guide Update Bans Code Not Written By A Human Who Is Currently Not On PTO
The GNOME Desktop Environment Review Board has issued a stern, all-caps memo: all new Shell Extensions must be human-authored. Apparently, the new rule forbids extensions made using AI-generated code, treating it like the tech equivalent of bringing an unauthorized desk plant into the office. The fear is that the generative models are submitting code without proper indentation and, worse, without having filed a JIRA ticket first.
This is less a stand for artistic integrity and more a fight over which team gets to decide the approved color palette for the 'About' dialog box. The underlying concern is, of course, that an AI might write code that actually works the first time, thereby setting an impossible and unsustainable standard for the rest of the engineering department. =======
Intel's Q4 Strategy: Acquire a $1.6B Problem
Intel is reportedly nearing a $1.6 billion deal for AI chip startup SambaNova. This is being lauded internally as a 'synergistic talent acquisition,' which translates to: we needed to burn cash before the end of the fiscal year and now have 400 new employees who will spend the next 18 months figuring out which internal email list they belong to. The chips, while 'revolutionary,' will be retired next quarter and re-released under a new, slightly different codename, thereby justifying the acquisition price tag as 'strategic market positioning.'
The new team's first official task is to update all their external slide decks to the corporate template, which is still hosted on a SharePoint server running Windows XP. Any internal resistance to the new template will be logged under the 'Cultural Non-Alignment' metric and addressed during the next round of 'right-sizing.' >>>>>>> Stashed changes
The Apple vs. Epic Office Feud Continues, Now With More Contempt
In what is now simply the longest-running, most expensive corporate drama, Apple has lost its appeal in the ongoing contempt case with Epic Games. The disagreement boils down to whether Apple is following the court's instruction to make the "Buy" button visible, or if they just moved the button's CSS file to a directory three levels deeper and declared it "compliant."
Apple is understandably frustrated that the court system keeps hitting 'Reply All' on their internal legal memos, forcing them to adhere to the new filing structure. This entire debacle is a perfect illustration of two departments—Legal and Product—that refuse to look at each other's documentation, causing a minor, multi-billion-dollar workflow issue. =======
Procedural Update: AI Code Banned from Desktop; Accounts Locked for Excessive Gifting
The GNOME Shell Extensions team has banned code generated by AI, citing concerns that the extensions might begin to "make sense" or "be too reliable." The official policy clarifies that only human-written code, containing emotionally rich, yet critical, flaws, is permitted to run on the desktop to ensure a truly unique and unpredictable user experience.
Separately, our friends at Apple decided to lock a user's account after they redeemed a gift card. This is standard operational procedure; the system flagged the act of transferring value as suspicious, proving the internal algorithm for 'trust' has achieved parity with a deeply cynical middle manager. The user is currently on hold with the Compliance department, listening to an 8-bit rendition of the hold music. >>>>>>> Stashed changes
Briefs
-
<<<<<<< Updated upstream
- CMS Hypocrisy: A new post argues you should never build a CMS, which is a lot like a plumber telling you to never fix your own leaky faucet while he is actively fixing your leaky faucet.
- Intel's Receipt: Intel is nearing a $1.6B deal to acquire AI chip startup SambaNova. This is just the corporate version of buying a bigger, more complicated server rack that does the exact same thing as the old one, but requires new training.
- Apple Account Lockdown: Redeeming a gift card is now apparently a critical security violation that triggers a full account lock. You should be punished for attempting to purchase their products. =======
- Box Office Synergies: A study suggests that online piracy may boost box office revenue. Our Content Security team has filed this under "Things We Cannot Publicly Acknowledge Are True."
- Product Management Memo: A strong opinion piece suggests that you should never build a Content Management System. This report has been immediately forwarded to the 3 new CMS projects currently in the backlog for 'internal review.'
- Source Control (Alternative): A new resource list for Awesome-Jj: Jujutsu Things has been posted. Finally, a Git replacement that requires a martial arts background to resolve merge conflicts. >>>>>>> Stashed changes
Q4 COMPLIANCE & SECURITY AWARENESS TRAINING (MANDATORY)
Which of the following constitutes an acceptable reason for an account lockout?